Many years ago I had heard comments about statistics. I am sure you can add to the list . Some of them are interesting. One was ,' there are lies and then there are lies , and then there is statistics!'. The other one was, 'if you put one hand in boiling hot water and other in ice cold water, then statistically you are at comfort'. So sometimes when we in medicine talk about chance , or probability or possibility , we truly are talking about what happens to majority . But by no means this is 100% but we in medicine get our opinion further confirmed as majority of the patients behave as we knew from the statistical data. I have been always puzzled as to why in a study all the patients don't behave same way . The sugar is sweet and everyone who tastes it will say the same thing . Then why a particular cancer in particular stage behaves differently in different patient ?These thoughts came to my mind when I saw this 74yeras old patient recently.
He is a 75 years old male whom I saw several years ago . He was maybe 60 years old at that time and had come to me for an abnormal cheat x-ray. So I did a CT scan and then a biopsy. The CT scan showed that he had a mass in the right lower lobe and there were number of lymph nodes in the chest that were enlarged. This indicated spread of cancer to these nodes and made him inoperable . The biopsy confirmed the lung cancer . So he was treated with radiation and chemotherapy. Per my 'thinking' -which was based on the statistical data of this type of cancer in inoperable stage,- was that he was not going to last mare than 2 or 3 years. I had told him that and he had known it to from other sources including oncologist. Certainly we all read the same books and know the same data. But he did not die . So I continued to follow him and he did OK .Few years passed by and it was more than 10 years that he not only did not die , but had no evidence of the cancer. Then it happened. His CT scan was abnormal. So I did a bronchoscopy. He had new cancer . So he was started on new chemotherapy. We could not do more radiation . So I followed him up and he continued to do well . May be it was 2 more years and he coughed up blood. So I did a bronchoscopy . His chemo was stopped as he had no evidence of cancer . My bronchoscopy showed that he had recurrence of the right sided cancer and there was a different cancer on left upper lobe . The interesting part was that in spite of me seeing the cancer - a new one - on left side , the CT scan did not show any cancer, not did PET scan showed the cancer. ( another statistical data which was not right ). So he was given different chemo . This time he got quite sick. He could not eat and developed weakness in the legs and had number of other issues . He also had pneumonia and swelling of the legs . He was so weak that he could not even stand up . So I told him and to his wife that there was no sense in continuing the chemo and made him 'no code' . He was discharged to extended care facility. He needed help and the wife could not have taken care of him at home . I did not think he was going to last more than few weeks . So I forgot about him . He showed up in my office about 7 or 8 months down the road . He was walking , and eating well and was doing OK.So I did another CT scan and as it was abnormal did another bronchoscopy. He had recurrence of the cancer on left , but none on right. I had stopped counting as to how many times he was cured or told that he was cured and had new cancer or recurrence of the cancer . Statisticaly this is impossible . He has defied all the odds.
He is a 75 years old male whom I saw several years ago . He was maybe 60 years old at that time and had come to me for an abnormal cheat x-ray. So I did a CT scan and then a biopsy. The CT scan showed that he had a mass in the right lower lobe and there were number of lymph nodes in the chest that were enlarged. This indicated spread of cancer to these nodes and made him inoperable . The biopsy confirmed the lung cancer . So he was treated with radiation and chemotherapy. Per my 'thinking' -which was based on the statistical data of this type of cancer in inoperable stage,- was that he was not going to last mare than 2 or 3 years. I had told him that and he had known it to from other sources including oncologist. Certainly we all read the same books and know the same data. But he did not die . So I continued to follow him and he did OK .Few years passed by and it was more than 10 years that he not only did not die , but had no evidence of the cancer. Then it happened. His CT scan was abnormal. So I did a bronchoscopy. He had new cancer . So he was started on new chemotherapy. We could not do more radiation . So I followed him up and he continued to do well . May be it was 2 more years and he coughed up blood. So I did a bronchoscopy . His chemo was stopped as he had no evidence of cancer . My bronchoscopy showed that he had recurrence of the right sided cancer and there was a different cancer on left upper lobe . The interesting part was that in spite of me seeing the cancer - a new one - on left side , the CT scan did not show any cancer, not did PET scan showed the cancer. ( another statistical data which was not right ). So he was given different chemo . This time he got quite sick. He could not eat and developed weakness in the legs and had number of other issues . He also had pneumonia and swelling of the legs . He was so weak that he could not even stand up . So I told him and to his wife that there was no sense in continuing the chemo and made him 'no code' . He was discharged to extended care facility. He needed help and the wife could not have taken care of him at home . I did not think he was going to last more than few weeks . So I forgot about him . He showed up in my office about 7 or 8 months down the road . He was walking , and eating well and was doing OK.So I did another CT scan and as it was abnormal did another bronchoscopy. He had recurrence of the cancer on left , but none on right. I had stopped counting as to how many times he was cured or told that he was cured and had new cancer or recurrence of the cancer . Statisticaly this is impossible . He has defied all the odds.
No comments:
Post a Comment